Jon Ambler

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the question : "Each year the Comox Valley is experiencing heavier traffic volumes, especially on the main arterial roads. What are your views on how to deal with this problem? "

Bicycles and vehicles and pedestrians all need access to a functional, affordable and effective road system. Each segment has needs that must be met where possible, but without impacting the needs of the other two user groups.

For this reason at Council we listen to the Cycling Task Force and other groups as they try to make progress in enahncing cycling safety, because I know full well that one bike on the road equals one less car! This speaks directly to the question above.You can check my voting record: I have been in favour of spending money on cycling infrastructure when it was recommended by the Task Force.

As the cars fill the roads the bikes are squeezed, so an approach that has potential is to have designated cycling paths, away from vehicles. When Ed Schum came to Council with the idea of a bridge to get pedestrians and cyclists off the 5 and 17 Street bridges I voted in favour of a serious look at the idea.  I do not know if it will work, but it is certainly worth looking at. One Councillor didn't even want to consider the idea! I also endorse the idea of a multi-user group examining where designated bike paths can go on roads. Local neighbours, cyclists and drivers must all get the chance to come up with the solution that best meets everyone's needs.

Thank you

Jon Ambler